Transparent Replications by Clearer Thinking
@replicationsTracked since May 2026
Creating replications of recently published psychology studies.
Where the 24 observed tier members sit
Membership tiersLargest observed tier is $0 Free. Tier totals include free-tier members and come from the Aug 29, 2026 public snapshot, so they do not reconcile to the paid-member total.
8 paid members · 30-day rate from 23 observed days
The chart only uses Transparent Replications by Clearer Thinking's observed public history. Comparison peers are listed below, but comparable trend series are not available yet.
Where Transparent Replications by Clearer Thinking ranks
Creator comparisonsSemantic matches are not ready, so this fixed cohort uses the best available category, audience, pricing, and cadence evidence.
Ranking data · includes stale rows| Rank | Creator and why included | Paid members | Gap vs Transparent Replications by Clearer Thinking | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |  deuveirWritingCategory, audience, pricing & cadence | 8 | Same value | Aug 29, 2026 |
| #1 |  Dickson Severe WeatherWritingCategory, audience, pricing & cadence | 8 | Same value | Aug 29, 2026 |
| #1 |  Transparent Replications by Clearer ThinkingProfileWritingPaid members position in Recommended cohort | 8 | Reference | Aug 29, 2026Stale |
| #4 |  GrandpaOak / Fresh Dayz 10XLOOT DayZ ServersWritingCategory, audience, pricing & cadence | 5 | 3 fewer | Aug 29, 2026 |
The rank uses the full fixed cohort. This table shows up to five creators around Transparent Replications by Clearer Thinking; the coverage summary above still counts everyone.
Recent posts
What they publishPreviews available for 6 of 3 posts
Image Latest postPublicReport #3: Replication of “Knowledge about others reduces one’s own sense of anonymity” (Nature | Shah & LaForest 2022)We ran a replication of study 2A from this paper, which tested whether knowing additional information about another person changed what participants thought the other person would know about them. The primary result in the original study failed to replicate. There was no relationship between whether participants were given information about their ‘partner’ and how likely the participants thought their ‘partner’ would be to detect a lie the participant told.
Nov 21, 2022 0 likes 0 commentsWork with this creator
Save, compare, or return to the Explore view you came from.